Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Future of BioethicsInternational Dialogues$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Akira Akabayashi

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199682676

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682676.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 24 October 2021

Response to Commentaries

Response to Commentaries

Further Thoughts on Implementing Accountability for Reasonableness

Chapter:
(p.590) 16.6 Response to Commentaries
Source:
The Future of Bioethics
Author(s):

James Sabin

Norman Daniels

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682676.003.0081

Accountability for reasonableness is no panacea for various political problems. Daniel Callahan suggests that accountability for reasonableness requires strong leadership—perhaps the leadership of a judge—and we agree that proper management of the decision-making process requires strong leadership. Prof. Okuda suggests that there is an important historical component (he refers to “archives”), and the authors agree that it is the historical accumulation of a record of public rationales that constitutes the commitments of decision-makers over time. Prof. Inoue suggests that social consensus on a principle such as equality of opportunity may allow appropriate priority setting decisions, but the authors argue that such general principles are too indeterminate and the authors doubt there is social consensus on fine-grained principles that can resolve disagreements. The process requires participants selected appropriately given the context; they must be committed to finding mutually acceptable justifications. Ethical deliberation does not require technical expertise.

Keywords:   Accountability for reasonableness, leadership, participants, social consensus

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .