Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Doing and Allowing Harm$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Fiona Woollard

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780199683642

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683642.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 04 August 2021

Counterexamples and Objections

Counterexamples and Objections

Chapter:
(p.80) 5 Counterexamples and Objections
Source:
Doing and Allowing Harm
Author(s):

Fiona Woollard

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683642.003.0005

This chapter focuses on various counterexamples and objections to the analysis of the distinction between doing and allowing. A typical gun fires through the removal of a barrier (the sear) which has been holding back a coiled spring. The author’s account may thus seem to misclassify firing a gun as merely allowing harm. The author shows that it does not. She also discusses the objection that the account illegitimately appeals to normative or conventional facts, and objections based on the role of intuition in the arguments. The author argues that neither of these objections undermines her account.

Keywords:   distinction between doing and allowing, firing a gun, normative facts, the role of intuition

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .