Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Which Policy for Europe?Power and Conflict inside the European Commission$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Miriam Hartlapp, Julia Metz, and Christian Rauh

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199688036

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688036.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 January 2021

Shaping Policies for Europe

Shaping Policies for Europe

Internal Position Formation between Problem-solving, Competence Expansion, and Political Ideology

(p.282) 12 Shaping Policies for Europe
Which Policy for Europe?

Miriam Hartlapp

Julia Metz

Christian Rauh

Oxford University Press

In the central conceptual contribution of the book, an innovative threefold typology of highly stylized and contrasting process models captures essential features of position formation inside the EU Commission. Friction in the Commission’s policy output is explained by either technocratic problem-solving, utility maximizing competence-seeking, or ideologically motivated policy-seeking. Within these types different factors and diverging mechanisms are relevant explanations of position formation. As context factors, issue uncertainty favors functional problem-solving while issue salience tilts Commission agency towards the more political modes of competence- or policy-seeking. Empirically, our cases most often corresponded to the ideal type of functional problem-solving with respect to DGs’ position formation while the competence-seeking type most often characterized our cases with respect to internal assertiveness. Finally, ideological policy-seeking is rare but united some of our most extreme cases in terms of the policy proposed for Europe.

Keywords:   conceptual model, ideal types, technocratic, competence-seeking, policy-seeking, Commission agency, issue uncertainty, salience

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .