Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Bayesian Statistics 9$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

José M. Bernardo, M. J. Bayarri, James O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, David Heckerman, Adrian F. M. Smith, and Mike West

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199694587

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694587.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 05 December 2020

Association Tests that Accommodate Genotyping Uncertainty *

Association Tests that Accommodate Genotyping Uncertainty *

Chapter:
(p.393) Association Tests that Accommodate Genotyping Uncertainty*
Source:
Bayesian Statistics 9
Author(s):

Thomas A. Louis

Benilton S. Carvalho

M. Daniele Fallin

Rafael A. Irizarryi

Qing Li

Ingo Ruczinski

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694587.003.0013

High‐throughput single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, typically used in genome‐wide association studies with a trait of interest, provide estimates of genotypes for up to several million loci. Most genotype estimates are very accurate, but genotyping errors do occur and can influence test statistics, p‐values and ranks. Some SNPs are harder to call than others due to probe properties and other technical/biological factors; uncertainties can be associated with features of interest. SNP‐ and case‐specific genotype posterior probabilities are available, but they are typically not used or used only informally, for example by setting aside the most uncertain calls. To improve on these approaches we take full advantage of Bayesian structuring and develop an analytic framework that accommodates genotype uncertainties. We show that the power of a score test (and statistical information more generally) is directly a function of the correlation of the genotype probabilities with the true genotypes. We demonstrate that compared to picking a single AA, AB or BB genotype or to setting aside difficult calls, Bayesian structuring can substantially increase statistical information for detecting a true association and for ranking SNPs, whether the ranking be frequentist or optimal Bayes. This improvement is primarily associated with genotypes that are difficult to call.

Keywords:   Association Studies, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, Genotype Uncertainty, Bayesian Structuring and Ranking

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .