A Priori Testimony Revisited
A Priori Testimony Revisited
In previous work, Malmgren critically examined Burge’s case for the thesis that there’s a priori knowledge by testimony. Neta has recently defended Burge against one of Malmgren’s key objections. In this chapter, she responds to Neta, further explores another strand of her original criticism, and evaluates the prospects for vindicating Burge’s thesis in a quite different way—with appeal to a ‘fast track’ model of testimony.
Keywords: a priori, testimony, introspection, warrant-preservation, entitlement
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .
