Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Ideology, Psychology, and Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jon Hanson

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199737512

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 16 June 2021

Aggressive Interrogation and Retributive Justice: A Proposed Psychological Model

Aggressive Interrogation and Retributive Justice: A Proposed Psychological Model

(p.574) Chapter 16 Aggressive Interrogation and Retributive Justice: A Proposed Psychological Model
Ideology, Psychology, and Law

Avani Mehta Sood

Kevin M. Carlsmith

Oxford University Press

The use of aggressive interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects is typically justified on utilitarian grounds. This chapter presents evidence that those who support such techniques are actually fuelled more by retributive motives. One experimental study conducted with a broad national sample of US residents found that interrogation recommendations are more sensitive to manipulation of the target’s history of bad acts than to manipulation of his likelihood of useful knowledge. Moreover, the desire for harsh interrogation is largely isomorphic with the desire to punish, and both effects are mediated by the perceived moral status of the target. A second study demonstrated conditions under which nationality and geographical proximity of the detainee make a difference to interrogation and morality judgments. The implications of our results are discussed with regard to national policy on torture-interrogation.

Keywords:   torture, interrogation, retributive justice, just deserts, deterrence theory, utilitarianism, punishment motives, moral status, morality, nationality, in-group, out-group, plausible deniability, black sheep effect

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .