Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Luck of the DrawThe Role of Lotteries in Decision Making$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Peter Stone

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199756100

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756100.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 23 November 2020

The Idea of Sortition

The Idea of Sortition

Chapter:
(p.119) 6 The Idea of Sortition
Source:
The Luck of the Draw
Author(s):

Peter Stone

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756100.003.0006

The most common practical use of lotteries in decision-making concerns the allocation of goods, that is, the domain of justice. The second most common use concerns the assignment of responsibilities, such as public office. This use, sometimes known as sortition, has a long pedigree, with examples to be found in ancient Athens, Renaissance Venice and Florence, and the modern Anglo-American jury. This chapter examines three arguments for sortition. The first simply treats public office as a good, and argues that the demands of allocative justice (including the impartiality principle, which sometimes dictates the use of lotteries) apply to it. The second argument recognizes lotteries as a means of preventing corruption. If reasons have no place in the selection of public officials, then powerful interests cannot stack the deck with candidates they prefer. The third argument points to the ability of lotteries to ensure descriptive representation. All three of these arguments, the chapter concludes, rest upon the sanitizing effect that lotteries can have, although they do not always see value in this effect.

Keywords:   lottery, sortition, Athens, Venice, Florence, jury, justice, impartiality, corruption, descriptive representation

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .