Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mathematics and Scientific Representation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher Pincock

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199757107

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199757107.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 August 2020



(p.203) 10 Explanation
Mathematics and Scientific Representation

Christopher Pincock

Oxford University Press

This chapter explores the more recent attempts to rescue the indispensability argument for platonism by appeal to the explanatory contributions which mathematics makes in science. Pincock argues that the different epistemic contributions which were articulated in part one help to clarify some of the different ways in which mathematics can help with scientific explanations. At the same time, Pincock argues that there are systematic barriers to using inference to the best explanation to support the truth of any substantial mathematical claims. These problems relate to the intricate structures encountered in pure mathematics and our lack of evidence that anything like this is instantiated in the physical world.

Keywords:   mathematical explanation, inference to the best explanation, indispensability argument

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .