Kenya’s Struggle against the Moi Dictatorship
Kenya’s Struggle against the Moi Dictatorship
Daniel arap Moi called Kenya a “single party democracy,” but little democracy was evident during his 25-year rule. Kenyan churches condemned the regime and used transnational religious networks to shed light on Moi’s tyrannical practices. Eventually, international donors suspended $350 million in aid. Desperate for this funding, Moi complied with donors’ demands for multiparty elections. The election created an opportunity to oust the dictator, but Moi retained power by developing an effective counterstrategy. His strategy included two elements. First, Moi divided the opposition movement by intentionally igniting long-standing ethnic tensions. Second, Moi generated the appearance of a free election while still controlling the outcome. Specifically, he limited his fraudulent and obstructionist actions to the preelection period and kept voting processes relatively clean on election day. This enabled Moi to persuade the international community that the election was fair enough to repeal the sanctions. In so doing, international donors prolonged the dictatorship.
Keywords: Kenya, Daniel arap Moi, Forum for the Restoration of Democracy, international sanctions
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .
