Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Just and Unjust PeaceAn Ethic of Political Reconciliation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Daniel Philpott

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199827565

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199827565.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 04 December 2020

Is Religion Fit for Reconciliation?

Is Religion Fit for Reconciliation?

Chapter:
(p.97) 6 Is Religion Fit for Reconciliation?
Source:
Just and Unjust Peace
Author(s):

Daniel Philpott

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199827565.003.0007

This chapter considers the liberal criticism that religious justifications for reconciliation do not belong in politics. It first shows that religion is pervasive in the global politics of reconciliation. It then answers the criticisms that religious claims are destabilizing and that religious claims are disrespectful. Finally, it proposes an ethic of political engagement that expands on the concept of “rooted reason” in Chapter 1.

Keywords:   public reason, rooted reason, public justification

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .