Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The History and Future of BioethicsA Sociological View$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John H. Evans

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199860852

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860852.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 23 June 2021

Task Clarification, Saying “No,” and Making the Argument for Jurisdiction

Task Clarification, Saying “No,” and Making the Argument for Jurisdiction

Chapter:
(p.100) (p.101) Chapter 4 Task Clarification, Saying “No,” and Making the Argument for Jurisdiction
Source:
The History and Future of Bioethics
Author(s):

John H. Evans

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860852.003.0005

This chapter further clarifies the jurisdictions of the bioethics profession by showing that the profession actually has a subsidiary jurisdiction to science and medicine in the research bioethics, health care ethics consultation and public policy bioethics jurisdictions. In research bioethics and health care ethics consultation the profession has the metaphorical role of the watchdog for the values and ethics of science and medicine. While this subordinate jurisdiction is healthy for these two jurisdictions, in damages the standing of bioethicists in the public policy bioethics jurisdiction, as it limits the ability of the profession to say “no” to any new technological innovation. The second half of the chapter shows how the profession has never made a clear case for why it should have jurisdiction over public policy bioethics, and argue that the strongest case could be made by arguing for a modified form of common morality principlism.

Keywords:   bioethics, public policy bioethics, research bioethics, health care ethics consultation, science, democratic legitimation

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .