Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
LeibnizProtestant Theologian$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Irena Backus

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780199891849

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: June 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199891849.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 19 September 2021

Concluding Remarks

Concluding Remarks

(p.205) Concluding Remarks

Irena Backus

Oxford University Press

The Concluding Remarks draw together all the strands and open ends of this work, to conclude with the affirmation that Leibniz’s system was unique in its close blending of theology and philosophy. This meant, among other things, that he disagreed with most British philosophers on the questions of free will and necessity and that his theological positions on important issues were not acceptable to any of the existing Christian Confessions.

Keywords:   Theology, philosophy, British philosophers, confessionality

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .