Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Abrahamic ReligionsOn the Uses and Abuses of History$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Aaron W. Hughes

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199934645

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199934645.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 August 2020



(p.141) Conclusions
Abrahamic Religions

Aaron W. Hughes

Oxford University Press

The Conclusion makes the case that we ought to cease using the term “Abrahamic religions” because, as used in the present, it is primarily a theological neologism. However, the problem is deeper than simply the term “Abrahamic religions.” It is not the mere choice of terminology, but the category itself that needs rethinking. This rethinking must take the form of developing new conceptual modeling that avoids discrete religions interacting with one another, and instead envisages complexity and porosity between manifold subgroups.

Keywords:   Abrahamic religions, complexity, essentialism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .