This chapter examines stative psych-predicates in Mandarin, which can take objects that are interpreted as the “subject matter.” The chapter shows that the objects are real syntactic objects, and the transitive structure can alternate with an intransitive duì-object counterpart. Furthermore, it argues that the transitive psych-predicates are not causatives. Taking into account comparable data from Bantu, it argues that the “subject-matter” objects are possibly due to the presence of an applicative projection, whose head can be filled by moving the verb into it, or that can be optionally spelled out as duì. The chapter discusses the implications of this analysis with respect to analyticity, as well as the differences between Cantonese and Mandarin.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.