The vast majority of people involved with ADHD do not intend to promote or accept intolerance. Quite the contrary—many lobby against stigmatization of ADHD. Yet the negative valence of ADHD’s characterization carries into practices of identification and treatment, and into daily conversations, attitudes, and relationships. By their ubiquity, the predominant view of ADHD, and the associated practices, naturalize negative responses. And, because the predominant view depicts ADHD as a permanent feature of individuals, the negative responses accrue to diagnosed people as well. By limiting ADHD-diagnosable people’s options, these responses constitute a form of intolerance. The intolerance is not the old stigma—it is biologized and medicalized, rather than overtly moral. Nevertheless, the widespread uptake of ADHD is at least in part acquiescence to institutionalized intolerance.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.