Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Nature of Moral Responsibility – New Essays - Oxford Scholarship Online
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

The Nature of Moral Responsibility: New Essays

Randolph Clarke, Michael McKenna, and Angela M. Smith

Abstract

Recent philosophical work reveals considerable disagreement about what it is to be morally responsible for something. Indeed, some theorists claim to distinguish several varieties of moral responsibility, with different conditions that must be satisfied if one is to bear responsibility of one or another of these kinds. Debate on this point turns partly on disagreement about the kinds of responses made appropriate when one is blameworthy or praiseworthy. It is generally agreed that these include “reactive attitudes” such as resentment and gratitude, but there is disagreement about the nature of ... More

Keywords: blameworthiness, desert, moral responsibility, quality of will, reactive attitude, resentment

Bibliographic Information

Print publication date: 2015 Print ISBN-13: 9780199998074
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: June 2015 DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199998074.001.0001

Authors

Affiliations are at time of print publication.

Randolph Clarke, editor
Professor of Philosophy, Florida State University

Michael McKenna, editor
Professor and Keith Lehrer Chair of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and the Center for the Philosophy of Freedom, University of Arizona

Angela M. Smith, editor
Associate Professor of Philosophy, Washington and Lee University

Show Summary Details

subscribe or login to access all content.

Contents

View:

Introduction

Randolph Clarke, Michael McKenna, and Angela M. Smith

Part I The Nature of Moral Responsibility: Some Frameworks

1 The Strains of Involvement

Neal A. Tognazzini

Part II Quality of Will and the Deep Self

Part III Responsibility in Practice: Communication, Substantive Responsibility, and Moral Desert