Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Adam SmithSystematic Philosopher and Public Thinker$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Eric Schliesser

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780190690120

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190690120.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 09 May 2021



(p.373) 16 Conclusion
Adam Smith

Eric Schliesser

Oxford University Press

The concluding chapter defends Adam Smith from Jonathan Israel’s criticism (and misrepresentation). Israel treats Smith as belonging to the moderate Enlightenment. While this chapter is agnostic about the moderate vs radical Enlightenment distinction, it suggests that Adam Smith offers enduring criticisms of applying Radical thought to political affairs. By contrast, this chapter treats Adam Smith as an exemplary philosopher not in terms of the doctrines defended, but rather as a model, who shows how philosophers of each generation need to develop normative and political ideals in light of other systematic commitments that may guide policy in a humane and responsible fashion.

Keywords:   Adam Smith, radical Enlightenment, moderate Enlightenment, Jonathan Israel, exemplars, philosophy

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .