This chapter concludes the book. It reviews the book’s central argument and findings. It explains that the book found considerable support for the superiority-brinkmanship synthesis theory and that other theories found less support. It then discusses the implications of the book’s findings for international relations scholarship and for US nuclear policy. The primary theoretical contribution of this book was to resolve one of the most important and long-standing puzzles in the field of security studies: if nuclear superiority does not matter, then why do policymakers often act as if it does? For those interested in bridging the gap between international relations scholarship and US foreign policymaking, it sought to demonstrate that rigorous social science research can be policy-relevant. Finally, it examined the future of US nuclear posture and strategy and the nature of an ideal nuclear balance of power between the United States and its adversaries.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.