Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Defense of the Scientific HypothesisFrom Reproducibility Crisis to Big Data$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Bradley E. Alger

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780190881481

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2021

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190881481.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use.date: 30 June 2022

The Hypothesis in Science Education

The Hypothesis in Science Education

Chapter:
(p.329) 13 The Hypothesis in Science Education
Source:
Defense of the Scientific Hypothesis
Author(s):

Bradley E. Alger

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190881481.003.0013

This chapter presents a wide though unsystematic review of formal educational resources of information about the hypothesis, at levels from grade school through to professional science. The focus in the early school years is on the Next Generation Science Standards, intended to be a national norm for science teachers, as well as two commercial programs meant to guide science teaching. At the college level, several books on critical thinking are briefly analyzed, although the emphasis is on a popular textbook that is designed to teach how to think scientifically. The chapter points up several possible adverse influences on public perceptions of science, including views on topics ranging from astrology to global climate change, that could arise from misapprehensions about the nature of science that are fostered by many of these sources. Finally, attention turns to the websites of the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation to sample resources available to professional scientists. In general, the information concerning the scientific hypothesis across all of these sources was inconsistent in depth, detail, and accuracy. The chapter offers a number of suggestions for improving science education in this area.

Keywords:   national science standards, fault words, marginal science, pseudo-science, Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Giere, Bickle, Mauldin, black-box thinking, Matthew Syed

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .