Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Restructuring RelationsIndigenous Self-Determination, Governance, and Gender$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Rauna Kuokkanen

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780190913281

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2019

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190913281.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 29 November 2021

Self-Determination

Self-Determination

Foundational Value

Chapter:
(p.22) 1 Self-Determination
Source:
Restructuring Relations
Author(s):

Rauna Kuokkanen

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190913281.003.0002

Chapter 1 examines the conceptions of Indigenous self-determination. It begins with an overview of the global political discourse of Indigenous self-determination as a foundational right articulated especially within the UN framework since the 1980s. Drawing on the author’s fieldwork and building on Iris Marion Young’s concept of nondomination and Jennifer Nedelsky’s theory of relational autonomy, the chapter develops a theory of Indigenous self-determination that posits it as a foundational value that seeks to restructure all relations of domination, including gender, governance, colonial social and material relations, and unequal relations of justice. The chapter argues that an exclusive focus on the rights discourse provides a limited legalistic and state-centered conception of Indigenous self-determination that does not reflect the breadth of Indigenous self-determination, nor pays adequate attention to relations of domination beyond the state. In the participant interviews, Indigenous self-determination was defined in much broader terms than political autonomy construed as having control of one’s own affairs and decision-making powers as a distinct entity. Instead of focusing on politics and international law, the participants typically discussed the underlying values shaping their conceptions of Indigenous self-determination such as relationality, the paramount significance of the land, and freedom from domination.

Keywords:   theory of self-determination, international law, noninterference, decolonization, sovereignty, Indigenous rights discourse, norm of integrity, territorial integrity, individual integrity

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .