Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Abusive Constitutional BorrowingLegal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Rosalind Dixon and David Landau

Print publication date: 2021

Print ISBN-13: 9780192893765

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2021

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192893765.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 04 December 2021

Abusive Judicial Review

Abusive Judicial Review

Abusive Borrowing by and of Constitutional Courts

Chapter:
(p.81) 5 Abusive Judicial Review
Source:
Abusive Constitutional Borrowing
Author(s):

Rosalind Dixon

David Landau

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0005

This chapter explains the concept of abusive judicial review: the use of courts by regimes to achieve anti-democratic constitutional change. Abusive judicial review involves abusive constitutional borrowing in two distinct senses: first, regimes lean on captured or cowed courts as a strategy to legitimate or advance authoritarian goals, and second, those courts often draw upon liberal democratic doctrines in abusive ways. It develops a typology of two different forms of the phenomenon—a weak form where courts uphold authoritarian moves by political actors, and a strong form where they act more directly to remove obstacles to authoritarian programs. Finally, it draws out two main examples: the Venezuelan Supreme Court’s repression of the opposition-held legislature using a doctrine of ‘legislative omission’ and other tools, and the wielding of militant democracy doctrines by the Cambodian and Thai apex courts to ban parties for authoritarian ends.

Keywords:   judicial review, abusive judicial review, court-curbing, court-packing, militant democracy, legislative omission, Venezuelan Supreme Court, Cambodian Constitutional Court, Thai Constitutional Court

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .