Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Spoken Natural Language Dialog SystemsA Practical Approach$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ronnie W. Smith and D. Richard Hipp

Print publication date: 1995

Print ISBN-13: 9780195091878

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2020

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195091878.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 21 January 2022

System Implementation

System Implementation

Chapter:
(p.155) Chapter 6 System Implementation
Source:
Spoken Natural Language Dialog Systems
Author(s):

Ronnie W. Smith

D. Richard Hipp

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780195091878.003.0008

Without development of an actual working system it is impossible to empirically validate the proposed computational model. Thus, the architecture introduced in section 3.1 has been implemented on a Sun 4 workstation and later ported to a Spare II workstation. The majority of the code is written in Quintus Prolog while the parser is written in C. The system software is available via anonymous FTP as described in appendix C. The overall hardware configuration is illustrated in figure 6.1. Speech recognition is performed by a Verbex 6000 user-dependent connected-speech recognizer running on an IBM PC. The vocabulary is currently restricted to the 125 words given in table 7.1. Users are required to begin each utterance with the word “verbie” and end with the word “over” (e.g. “verbie, the switch is up, over”). The Verbex speech recognizer acknowledges each input with a small beep. These sentinel interactions act as a synchronization mechanism for the user arid the machine. Speech output is performed by a DECtalk DTCO1 text-to-speech converter. This chapter discusses the following technical aspects of the implementation. • The various knowledge representation formalisms. • The implemented domain processor, an expert system for assisting in simple circuit repair. • The implemented generation component. • The basic physical resource utilization of the system. The basis for the implementation has been the logic programming language, Prolog. Clocksin and Mellish [CM87] provide an introduction to this language. Pereira and Shieber [PS87] arid McCord [McC87] can be consulted for a discussion of the usage of Prolog for natural language analysis. Prolog allows the expression of rules and facts in a subset of first-order logic called Horn clauses. Prolog is supplemented with non-logical features that aid in efficient computation as well, but as a representational formalism, its utility in representing rules and facts in a declarative format provides a basis for the representation of knowledge and rules within the model. The Goal and Action Description Language was introduced in section 3.2.2. A detailed description is provided in appendx A. It is used as a standard formalism for representing goals that may be accomplished during a task.

Keywords:   Achievable subgoal, GALOP, Horn clauses, Knowledge representation, Message passing, Opcode, Prolog, Verbex, discourse-record, utterance-record

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .