Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Age of EmWork, Love, and Life when Robots Rule the Earth$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robin Hanson

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198754626

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2020

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198754626.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 04 March 2021

Information

Information

Chapter:
9 Information
Source:
The Age of Em
Author(s):

Robin Hanson

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198754626.003.0015

Interacting ems need not see exactly the same virtual environment. For example, each em might prefer to see a shared environment as decorated with their personal choices of colors or patterns. Ems might also prefer to overlay or augment their views of the virtual world with useful tags and statistics, or to see through virtual objects to see object components or to see what lies behind those objects. Virtual ems may have telescopic sight, allowing them to always vividly see anything anywhere they are allowed to view. However, overlays can impair perception, and so must be used carefully ( Sabelman and Lam 2015 ). To sensibly interact with others, ems usually want easy ways to quickly identify the aspects of their environments that they and their interaction partners see similarly. Some aspects of these worlds (such as where people are standing) are distinguished as shared by default, and interacting ems want standard ways to invite interaction partners to see some of their own less widely shared overlays and changes, and to accept such offers from others. At both work and play, many kinds of tasks require ems to manage physical systems. Such management often requires physical bodies (both immediate and extended) whose size, speed, shape, and materials sufficiently match those physical systems. It is also important for em minds to relate well to such bodies. But this seems feasible for a wide range of physical bodies. After all, people today interact with the world using a wide range of machines, such as vehicles and cranes, which they treat mentally as an extension of their bodies. For ems with task-matched physical bodies, the world they see and hear needn’t be an exact faithful representation of their physical world. For example, it might often be a sort of view like those in today’s head-up displays, overlaid with useful virtual annotations. But such overlays need to avoid overly obscuring important elements of that physical world. Because the feasibility, cost, and security of em interactions often depends on the physical and organizational locations of their brains and the brains of others, em virtual worlds may continually show such information about interaction partners. For example, ems often want to know when another em’s speed, period, phase, or distance makes direct fast interaction infeasible. So ems will need to share somewhat-realistic concepts of their locations in space and time.

Keywords:   appearances, bodies, clutter, deterministic, gravity, leisure, messages, nanotech manufacturing

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .