Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
EU Powers Under External PressureHow the EU's External Actions Alter its Internal Structures$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christina Eckes

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780198785545

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2019

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198785545.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 21 June 2021

Consequences of Choosing an External Legal Basis

Consequences of Choosing an External Legal Basis

Chapter:
(p.113) 4 Consequences of Choosing an External Legal Basis
Source:
EU Powers Under External Pressure
Author(s):

Christina Eckes

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198785545.003.0005

Chapter 4 discusses the constitutional consequences of the choice of legal basis in the context of external relations. The Union and its Member States are interlocked in a tight embrace, which leads to a far more complicated power division than may appear from a straightforward reading of the Treaty provisions on competences. The choice of the appropriate legal basis is the legal emanation of political power struggles between the Member States and the Union and among the EU institutions. The chapter identifies situations, in which the fact that law-making moves from the internal EU sphere to the external (i.e. international) sphere places more far-reaching restrictions on the Member States’ exercise of powers than would apply internally. It also argues that clarity in attributing responsibilities is a foundational requirement for bonding structures in a divided representative democracy, in which individuals are represented as EU citizens and national citizens. An adequate level of clarity on who is responsible for what is a necessary, albeit insufficient, condition for feeling represented and for limiting the ability of representatives to deny responsibilities. Finally, the chapter illustrates how the international obligations of the Member States are vested with the particular bite (i.e. effectiveness) of EU law when the question of who should take action, which is at the centre of the choice of legal basis, is avoided by concluding a mixed agreement. This limits the scope of manoeuvre of Member States as international actors.

Keywords:   external legal basis, choice of legal basis, cross-Treaty legal basis, mixed agreements, centre of gravity test, dual legal basis, parallel competences, pre-emption, geographical scope, bonding structures

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .