Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Inquisitive Semantics$

Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780198814788

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: December 2018

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198814788.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 June 2021

(p.197) References

(p.197) References

Source:
Inquisitive Semantics
Author(s):

Ivano Ciardelli

Jeroen Groenendijk

Floris Roelofsen

Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Abrusán, M. (2014). Weak Island Semantics. Oxford University Press.

Aher, M. (2013). Modals in Legal Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, University of Osnabrück.

Aher, M. and Groenendijk, J. (2015). Deontic and epistemic modals in suppositional [inquisitive] semantics. In E. Csipak and H. Zeijlstra, editors, Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, pages 2–19.

Aloni, M. (2005). A formal treatment of the pragmatics of questions and attitudes. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(5), 505–539.

Aloni, M. (2007). Free choice, modals and imperatives. Natural Language Semantics, 15(1), 65–94.

Aloni, M. and Ciardelli, I. (2013). A logical account of free-choice imperatives. In M. Aloni, M. Franke, and F. Roelofsen, editors, The dynamic, inquisitive, and visionary life of φ‎, ?φ‎, and ◊φ‎: a festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman, pages 1–17. ILLC Publications.

Aloni, M., Butler, A., and Dekker, P., editors (2007). Questions in Dynamic Semantics. Elsevier.

Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2006). Disjunction in Alternative Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2009). Counterfactuals, correlatives, and disjunction. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32, 207–244.

AnderBois, S. (2011). Issues and Alternatives. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.

AnderBois, S. (2012). Focus and uninformativity in Yukatek Maya questions. Natural Language Semantics, 20, 349–390.

AnderBois, S. (2014). The semantics of sluicing: beyond truth conditions. Language, 90(4), 887–926.

AnderBois, S. (2016a). Ellipsis in inquisitive semantics. In J. van Craenenbroeck and T. Temmerman, editors, to appear in The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford University Press.

AnderBois, S. (2016b). Negation, alternatives, and negative polar questions in American English. In K. von Heusinger, E. Onea, and M. Zimmerman, editors, to appear in Questions in Discourse. CRISPI.

Artemov, S. and Kuznets, R. (2006). Logical omniscience via proof complexity. In Z. Ésik, editor, Computer Science Logic: 20th International Workshop, CSL 2006, 15th Annual Conference of the EACSL, Szeged, Hungary, September 25–29, 2006. Proceedings, pages 135–149. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (p.198)

Beaver, D. and Clark, B. (2008). Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Blackwell.

Belnap, N. (1966). Questions, answers, and presuppositions. The Journal of Philosophy, 63(20), 609–611.

van Benthem, J. (2011). Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge University Press.

van Benthem, J. and Minică, S. (2012). Toward a dynamic logic of questions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(4), 633–669.

Bhat, D. (2005). Pronouns. Oxford University Press.

Biezma, M. and Rawlins, K. (2012). Responding to alternative and polar questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 35(5), 361–406.

Bledin, J. (2017). Fatalism and the logic of unconditionals. In A. Cremers, T. van Gessel, and F. Roelofsen, editors, Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 115–124.

Bledin, J. and Rawlins, K. (2016). Epistemic resistance moves. In M. Moroney, C.-R. Little, J. Collard, and D. Burgdorf, editors, Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26. LSA and CLC Publications.

Blok, D. (2015). The semantics and pragmatics of directional numeral modifiers. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 25).

Blutner, R. (2000). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics, 17(3), 189.

Büring, D. (2003). On d-trees, beans, and accents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 511–545.

Cable, S. (2010). Notes on the possible treatment of imperatives in inquisitive semantics. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Carlson, L. (1983). Dialogue Games. Dordrecht, Reidel.

Champollion, L., Ciardelli, I., and Roelofsen, F. (2015). Some questions in typed inquisitive semantics. Talk at workshop on Questions in Logic and Semantics, Amsterdam.

Champollion, L., Ciardelli, I., and Zhang, L. (2016). Breaking de Morgan’s Law in counterfactual antecedents. In M. Moroney, C.-R. Little, J. Collard, and D. Burgdorf, editors, Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26, Ithaca, NY. LSA and CLC Publications.

Charlow, S. (2014). On the Semantics of Exceptional Scope. Ph.D. thesis, New York University.

Chierchia, G. (2013). Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention. Oxford University Press.

Chierchia, G., Fox, D., and Spector, B. (2009). Hurford’s constraint and the theory of scalar implicatures: evidence for embedded implicatures. In P. Egré and G. Magri, editors, Presuppositions and implicatures, pages 47–62. Cambridge MA. MIT Press.

Chierchia, G., Fox, D., and Spector, B. (2012). Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In P. Portner, C. Maienborn, and K. von Heusinger, (p.199) editors, Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, volume 3, pages 2297–2331. Mouton de Gruyter.

Ciardelli, I. (2008). A generalized inquisitive semantics. Term paper, University of Amsterdam.

Ciardelli, I. (2009). Inquisitive Semantics and Intermediate Logics. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Ciardelli, I. (2010). A first-order inquisitive semantics. In M. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, and K. Schulz, editors, Logic, Language, and Meaning: Selected Papers from the Seventeenth Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 234–243. Springer.

Ciardelli, I. (2013). Inquisitive Semantics as a Truth-maker Semantics. Manuscript, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

Ciardelli, I. (2014). Modalities in the realm of questions: axiomatizing inquisitive epistemic logic. In R. Goré, B. Kooi, and A. Kurucz, editors, Advances in Modal Logic (AIML), pages 94–113, London. College Publications.

Ciardelli, I. (2016a). Dependency as question entailment. In S. Abramsky, J. Kontinen, J. Väänänen, and H. Vollmer, editors, Dependence Logic: Theory and Applications, pages 129–181. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Ciardelli, I. (2016b). Lifting conditionals to inquisitive semantics. In M. Moroney, C.-R. Little, J. Collard, and D. Burgdorf, editors, Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26. LSA and CLC Publications.

Ciardelli, I. (2018). Questions as information types. Synthese, 195(1), 321–365.

Ciardelli, I. (2016d). Questions in Logic. Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.

Ciardelli, I. (2017a). The dynamic logic of stating and asking: a study of inquisitive dynamic modalities. In A. Baltag, J. Seligman, and T. Yamada, editors, Logic, Rationality, and Interaction: Proceedings of LORI 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10455, pages 240–255.

Ciardelli, I. (2017b). Questions meaning = resolution conditions. Logic and Logical Philosophy 26(3), 383–416.

Ciardelli, I. and Aloni, M. (2016). Choice-offering imperatives in inquisitive and truth-maker semantics. Presented at ‘Imperatives: worlds and beyond’, Hamburg University, June 2016.

Ciardelli, I. and Otto, M. (2017). Bisimulation in inquisitive modal logic. Proceedings of TARK 2017, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 251, pages 151–166.

Ciardelli, I. and Roelofsen, F. (2011). Inquisitive logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40(1), 55–94.

Ciardelli, I. and Roelofsen, F. (2014). Issues in epistemic change. Presented at the European Epistemology Network Meeting, Madrid. Available via www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics. (p.200)

Ciardelli, I. and Roelofsen, F. (2015). Inquisitive dynamic epistemic logic. Synthese, 192(6), 1643–1687.

Ciardelli, I. and Roelofsen, F. (2017a). Hurford’s constraint, the semantics of disjunctions, and the nature of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics, 25(3), 199–222.

Ciardelli, I. and Roelofsen, F. (2018). An inquisitive perspective on modals and quantifiers. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 129–149.

Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., and Roelofsen, F. (2012). Inquisitive semantics. NASSLLI lecture notes, available via www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics.

Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., and Roelofsen, F. (2013a). Inquisitive semantics: a new notion of meaning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(9), 459–476.

Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., and Roelofsen, F. (2013b). Towards a logic of information exchange: an inquisitive witness semantics. In G. Bezhanishvili, V. Marra, S. Löbner, and F. Richter, editors, Logic, Language, and Computation: revised selected papers from the Ninth International Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation, pages 51–72. Springer.

Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., and Roelofsen, F. (2014). Information, issues, and attention. In D. Gutzmann, J. Köpping, and C. Meier, editors, Approaches to Meaning: Composition, Values, and Interpretation, pages 128–166. Brill.

Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., and Roelofsen, F. (2015). On the semantics and logic of declaratives and interrogatives. Synthese, 192(6), 1689–1728.

Ciardelli, I., Coppock, L., and Roelofsen, F. (2016). Implicatures of modified numerals: quality or quantity? Sinn und Bedeutung.

Ciardelli, I., Roelofsen, F., and Theiler, N. (2017a). Composing alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 40(1), 1–36.

Ciardelli, I., Iemhoff, R., and Yang, F. (2017b). Questions and dependency in intuitionistic logic. Manuscript, under review.

Ciardelli, I., Zhang, L., and Champollion, L. (2017c). Two switches in the theory of counterfactuals: a study of truth conditionality and minimal change. To appear in Linguistics and Philosophy.

Cohen, M. (2017). Reducing contrastive knowledge. Manuscript, Stanford University.

Coppock, E. and Brochhagen, T. (2013a). Diagnosing truth, interactive sincerity, and depictive sincerity. In Proceedings of SALT 2013, pages 358–375.

Coppock, E. and Brochhagen, T. (2013b). Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers. Semantics and Pragmatics, 6(3), 1–57.

Cremers, A. and Chemla, E. (2016). A psycholinguistic study of the exhaustive readings of embedded questions. Journal of Semantics, 33(1), 49–85.

Cremers, A., Roelofsen, F., and Uegaki, W. (2017a). Distributive ignorance implications of inquisitive and epistemic attitudes. Manuscript, ILLC, University of Amsterdam and LUCL, Leiden University.

Cremers, A., Coppock, L., Dotlacil, J., and Roelofsen, F. (2017b). Modified numerals: Two routes to ignorance. Manuscript, ILLC, University of Amsterdam. (p.201)

Cross, C. and Roelofsen, F. (2014). Questions. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Dalrymple, M., Kanazawa, M., Kim, Y., McHombo, S., and Peters, S. (1998). Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21(2), 159–210.

Dayal, V. (2016). Questions. Oxford University Press.

Dekker, P., Aloni, M., and Groenendijk, J. (2016). Questions. In P. Dekker and M. Aloni, editors, The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, pages 560–593. Cambridge University Press.

van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., and Kooi, B. (2007). Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer.

Eberle, R. A. (1974). A logic of believing, knowing, and inferring. Synthese, 26(3/4), 356–382.

Elliott, P. D., Klinedinst, N., Sudo, Y., and Uegaki, W. (2017). Predicates of relevance and theories of question embedding. Journal of Semantics, 34(3), 547–554.

Ellis, B., Jackson, F., and Pargetter, R. (1977). An objection to possible-world semantics for counterfactual logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 6(1), 355–357.

Fagin, R. and Halpern, J. Y. (1987). Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning. Artificial intelligence, 34(1), 39–76.

Fagin, R., Halpern, J. Y., Moses, Y., and Vardi, M. Y. (1995). Reasoning about knowledge. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

Fan, J., Wang, Y., and van Ditmarsch, H. (2015). Contingency and knowing whether. The Review of Symbolic Logic, pages 1–33.

Farkas, D. F. and Bruce, K. B. (2010). On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics, 27, 81–118.

Farkas, D. F. and Roelofsen, F. (2017). Division of labor in the interpretation of declaratives and interrogatives. Journal of Semantics, 34(2), 237–289.

Fine, K. (1975). Critical notice on Counterfactuals by D. Lewis. Mind, 84(1), 451–458.

Fine, K. (2012). Counterfactuals without possible worlds. The Journal of Philosophy, 109(3), 221–246.

Fine, K. (2014). Truth-maker semantics for intuitionistic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43(2–3), 221–246.

von Fintel, K. (1997). Bare plurals, bare conditionals, and only. Journal of Semantics, 14(1), 1–56.

von Fintel, K. (2004). Would you believe it? The king of France is back! (presuppositions and truth-value intuitions). In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer, editors, Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions and other Related Phenomena. Oxford University Press.

Frege, G. (1918). Der Gedanke. Beitrage zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus, 1, 58–77. Translated as Frege (1956). (p.202)

Frege, G. (1956). The thought: A logical inquiry. Mind, 56(259), 289–311.

Friedman, J. (2013). Question-directed attitudes. Philosophical Perspectives, 27(1), 145–174.

Gajewski, J. (2002). L-analyticity and natural language. Manuscript, MIT.

George, B. R. (2013). Knowing-wh, mention-some readings, and non-reducibility. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 2(2), 166–177.

van Gessel, T. (2016). Action models in inquisitive logic. MSc thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Ginzburg, J. (1995). Resolving questions, i. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18(5), 459–527.

Ginzburg, J. (1996). Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In J. Seligman, editor, Language, Logic, and Computation, volume 1.

Ginzburg, J. (2005). Abstraction and ontology: questions as propositional abstracts in type theory with records. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15(2), 113–130.

Ginzburg, J. (2010). Questions: logic and interaction. In J. Seligman, and A. ter Meulen editor, Handbook of Logic and Language, Second Edition, Elsevier.

Ginzburg, J. and Sag, I. A. (2000). Interrogative Investigations. CSLI Publications.

Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, editors, Syntax and Semantics, volume 3, pages 41–58. Harvard University Press.

Grilletti, G. (2017). Disjunction and existence properties in inquisitive first-order logic. To appear in Studia Logica.

Grilletti, G. and Ciardelli, I. (2017). An Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé game for inquisitive first-order logic. To appear in the proceedings of the Twelve International Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation.

Groenendijk, J. (1999). The logic of interrogation. In T. Matthews and D. Strolovitch, editors, Semantics and Linguistic Theory, pages 109–126. Cornell University Press.

Groenendijk, J. (2009). Inquisitive semantics: two possibilities for disjunction. In P. Bosch, D. Gabelaia, and J. Lang, editors, Seventh International Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation. Springer.

Groenendijk, J. and Roelofsen, F. (2009). Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. Presented at the Workshop on Language, Communication, and Rational Agency at Stanford.

Groenendijk, J. and Roelofsen, F. (2010). Radical inquisitive semantics. Presented at the Sixth International Symposium on Logic, Cognition, and Communication at the University of Latvia.

Groenendijk, J. and Roelofsen, F. (2015). Towards a suppositional inquisitive semantics. In M. Aher, D. Hole, E., Jeřábek, and C., Kupke, editors, Logic, Language, and Computation: 10th International Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, (p.203) Language, and Computation, TbiLLC 2013, Gudauri, Georgia, September 23–27, 2013. Revised Selected Papers, pages 137–156. Springer.

Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1984). Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1989). Type-shifting rules and the semantics of interrogatives. In Properties, Types and Meaning, pages 21–68. Springer.

Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1991). Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 39–100.

Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1997). Questions. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen, editors, Handbook of Logic and Language, pages 1055–1124. Elsevier.

Gunlogson, C. (2001). True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.

Gunlogson, C. (2008). A question of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 101–136.

Haida, A. (2007). The Indefiniteness and Focusing of Wh-Words. Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt University, Berlin.

Haida, A. and Repp, S. (2013). Disjunction in wh-questions. In Proceedings of NELS 40.

Hamami, Y. (2014). Inquiry in conversation: towards a modelling in inquisitive pragmatics. Logique et Analyse, 228, 637–661.

Hamblin, C. L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language, 10(1), 41–53.

Hausser, R. and Zaefferer, D. (1978). Questions and answers in a context-dependent Montague grammar. In F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt, editors, Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, pages 339–358. Reidel.

Hedberg, N., Sosa, J. M., and Görgülü, E. (2014). The meaning of intonation in yes-no questions in American English: a corpus study. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13(2), 321–368.

Heim, I. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Heim, I. (2016). Lecture notes on the semantics of interrogative clauses. Advanced Semantics (24.973), MIT Spring 2016, accessible via https://stellar.mit.edu.

Heim, I. and Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell.

Herbstritt, M. (2014). Why can’t we be surprised whether it rains in Amsterdam? A semantics for factive verbs and embedded questions. M.Sc. thesis, University of Amsterdam, supervised by Maria Aloni and Floris Roelofsen.

Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Cornell University Press. (p.204)

Hintikka, J. (1969). Semantics for Propositional Attitudes, pages 87–111. Springer.

Hintikka, J. (1975). Knowledge, belief, and logical consequence. In J. Hintikka, editor, Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives, pages 161–181. Springer.

Hintikka, J. (1979). Impossible possible worlds vindicated. In E. Saarinen, editor, Game-Theoretical Semantics: Essays on Semantics by Hintikka, Carlson, Peacocke, Rantala, and Saarinen, pages 367–379. Springer Netherlands.

Holliday, W. (2014). Partiality and adjointness in modal logic. In R. Goré, B. Kooi, and A. Kurucz, editors, Advances in Modal Logic (AiML), pages 313–332, London. College Publications.

Holliday, W. (2018). On possibility semantics for modal logic. Manuscript under review.

Horn, L. R. (1984). Towards a new taxonomy of pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based implicatures. In D. Schiffrin, editor, Meaning, Form, and Use in Context, pages 11–42. Georgetown University Press.

Hull, R. D. (1975). A semantics for superficial and embedded questions in natural language. In E. Keenan, editor, Formal Semantics of Natural language, pages 33–45. Cambridge University Press.

Hulstijn, J. (1997). Structured information states: raising and resolving issues. In A. Benz and G. Jäger, editors, Proceedings of MunDial.

Hurford, J. (1974). Exclusive or inclusive disjunction. Foundations of Language, 11(3), 409–411.

Isaacs, J. and Rawlins, K. (2008). Conditional questions. Journal of Semantics, 25, 269–319.

Jäger, G. (1996). Only updates: on the dynamics of the focus particle only. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, editors, Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium.

Jayaseelan, K. (2001). Questions and question-words incorporating quantifiers in Malayalam. Syntax, 4(2), 63–93.

Jayaseelan, K. (2008). Question particles and disjunction. Manuscript, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.

Kadmon, N. and Landman, F. (1993). Any. Linguistics and philosophy, 16(4), 353–422.

Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof, editors, Formal Methods in the Study of Language, pages 277–322. Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam.

Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic inquiry, 4(2), 169–193.

Karttunen, L. (1974). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1(1–3), 181–194. (p.205)

Karttunen, L. (1977). Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 3–44.

Karttunen, L. and Peters, S. (1976). What indirect questions conventionally implicate. In CLS 12: Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting, pages 351–368. Chicago Linguistic Society.

Katzir, R. and Singh, R. (2013). Hurford disjunctions: embedded exhaustification and structural economy. In U. Etxeberria, A. Fălăuș, A., Irurtzun, and B. Leferman, editors, Sinn und Bedeutung 18, pages 201–216.

Kaufmann, M. and Kaufmann, S. (2015). Conditionals and modality. In S. Lappin and C. Fox, editors, Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory—Second Edition. Wiley-Blackwell.

Kaufmann, S. (2013). Causal premise semantics. Cognitive Science, 37(6), 1136–1170.

Koralus, P. and Mascarenhas, S. (2014). The erotetic theory of reasoning: bridges between formal semantics and the psychology of deductive inference. Philosophical Perspectives, 27(1), 312–365.

Kratzer, A. (1981). Partition and revision: the semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 10(2), 201–216.

Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and conditionals: new and revised perspectives. Oxford University Press.

Kratzer, A. and Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: the view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu, editor, The Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, pages 1–25.

Krifka, M. (2001a). For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. Audiatur Vox Sapientia. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, pages 287–319.

Krifka, M. (2001b). Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics, 9(1), 1–40.

Krifka, M. (2011). Questions and question-acts. Presented at the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, December.

van Kuppevelt, J. (1995). Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics, 31(1), 109–147.

Ladusaw, W. A. (1980). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Blackwell.

Malamud, S. and Stephenson, T. (2015). Three ways to avoid commitments: declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard. Journal of Semantics, 32, 275–311.

Mascarenhas, S. (2009). Inquisitive Semantics and Logic. Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Mascarenhas, S. (2014). Formal Semantics and the Psychology of Reasoning: Building New Bridges and Investigating Interactions. Ph.D. thesis, New York University. (p.206)

McKay, T. and Van Inwagen, P. (1977). Counterfactuals with disjunctive antecedents. Philosophical Studies, 31(5), 353–356.

Menéndez-Benito, P. (2005). The Grammar of Choice. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Meyer, M.-C. (2014). Deriving Hurford’s constraint. In T. Snider, S. D’Antonio, and M. Weigand, editors, Semantics and Linguistic Theory 24, pages 577–596. LSA and CLC Publications.

Minică, Ștefan. (2011). Dynamic Logic of Questions. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

Novel, M. and Romero, M. (2010). Movement, variables and Hamblin alternatives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14, pages 322–338.

Nute, D. (1975). Counterfactuals and the similarity of words. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(21), 773–778.

Nute, D. (1980). Conversational scorekeeping and conditionals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 9(2), 153–166.

Olsson, E. J. and Westlund, D. (2006). On the role of the research agenda in epistemic change. Erkenntnis, 65(2), 165–183.

Onea, E. (2013). Potential questions in discourse and grammar. Habilitation Thesis, University of Göttingen.

Onea, E. and Steinbach, M. (2012). Where question, conditionals and topics converge. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Weidmann-Sassoon, K. Schulz, and M. Westera, editors, Logic, Language, and Meaning. Selected papers from the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 42–51, Springer.

Pearl, J. (2009). Causality. Cambridge University Press.

Punc̆ochár̆ V., (2015). Weak negation in inquisitive semantics. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 24(3), 323–355.

Punc̆ochár̆ V., (2017). Algebras of information states. Journal of Logic and Computation 27(5), 1643–1675.

Punc̆ochár̆ V., (2016). A generalization of inquisitive semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45(4), 399–428.

Punc̆ochár̆ V., (2017). Substructural inquisitive logics. Manuscript.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.

Rawlins, K. (2008). (Un)conditionals: An Investigation in the Syntax and Semantics of Conditional Structures. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.

Roberts, C. (1996). Information structure in discourse. In J. Yoon and A. Kathol, editors, OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, volume 49, pages 91–136. Ohio State University.

Roelofsen, F. (2013a). Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content. Synthese, 190(1), 79–102.

Roelofsen, F. (2013b). A bare bone semantics for attentive might. In M. Aloni, M. Franke, and F. Roelofsen, editors, The dynamic, inquisitive, and visionary (p.207) life of, φ‎, ?φ‎, and ◊φ‎: a festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman, pages 190–215. ILLC Publications.

Roelofsen, F. (2013c). An inquisitive perspective on meaning: the case of disjunction. Stanford Linguistics Colloquium, February 2013.

Roelofsen, F. (2015a). The semantics of declarative and interrogative lists. Manuscript, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

Roelofsen, F. (2015b). Two alternatives for disjunction: an inquisitive reconciliation. To appear in Questions in Discourse, edited by Klaus von Heusinger, Edgar Onea, and Malte Zimmermann.

Roelofsen, F. (2016). Information, issues, and live possibilities: might in conflicts, free choice, and questions. Presented at Situations, Information, and Semantic Content, Munich.

Roelofsen, F. (2017). Suprise for Lauri Karttunen. To appear in Lauri Karttunen Festschrift, edited by Cleo Condoravdi.

Roelofsen, F. and Farkas, D. F. (2015). Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions. Language, 91(2), 359–414.

Roelofsen, F. and van Gool, S. (2010). Disjunctive questions, intonation, and highlighting. In M. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, and K. Schulz, editors, Logic, Language, and Meaning: Selected Papers from the Seventeenth Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 384–394. Springer.

Roelofsen, F. and Uegaki, W. (2016). The distributive ignorance puzzle. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21.

Roelofsen, F., Herbstritt, M., and Aloni, M. (2016). The *whether puzzle. To appear in Questions in Discourse, edited by Klaus von Heusinger, Edgar Onea, and Malte Zimmermann.

Rojas-Esponda, T. (2013). The roadsigns of communication. In Proceedings of Semdial (DialDam), pages 131–139.

van Rooij, R. (2003). Questioning to resolve decision problems. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26(6), 727–763.

van Rooij, R. (2006). Free choice counterfactual donkeys. Journal of Semantics, 23(4), 383–402.

Sano, K. (2009). Sound and complete tree-sequent calculus for inquisitive logic. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Workshop on Logic, Language, Information, and Computation.

Sano, K. (2011). First-order inquisitive pair logic. In Proceedings of the Fourth Indian Conference on Logic and its Applications.

Sano, K. and Hara, Y. (2014). Conditional independence and biscuit conditional questions in Dynamic Semantics. In M. W. Todd Snider, Sarah D’Antonio, editor, Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), volume 24, pages 84–101. LSA and CLC Publications.

Santorio, P. (2016). Interventions in premise semantics. Forthcoming in Philosophers’ Imprint. (p.208)

Schulz, K. (2011). If you’d wiggled a, then b would’ve changed. Synthese, 179(2), 239–251.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Selkirk, E. (2011). The syntax-phonology interface. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2, 435–483.

Shan, C.-C. (2004). Binding alongside Hamblin alternatives calls for variable-free semantics. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14, pages 289–304.

Simons, M. (2001). Disjunction and alternativeness. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24(5), 597–619.

Simons, M. (2005). Dividing things up: the semantics of or and the modal/or interaction. Natural Language Semantics, 13(3), 271–316.

Slade, B. (2011). Formal and Philological Inquiries into the Nature of Interrogatives, Indefinites, Disjunction, and Focus in Sinhala and Other Languages. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Sparkes, B. (2016). Inquisitive conditional-doxastic logic. MSc thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Spector, B. (2005). Exhaustive interpretations: what to say and what not to say. Unpublished paper presented at the LSA workshop on Context and Content.

Spenader, J. (2015). Implicit causality and inquisitivity. Manuscript, University of Groningen.

Stalnaker, R. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In N. Rescher, editor, Studies in Logical Theory. Blackwell.

Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. Syntax and Semantics, 9, 315–332.

Stalnaker, R. (1991). The problem of logical omniscience, i. Synthese, 89(3), 425–440.

Starr, W. B. (2014). What ‘if’? Philosophical Imprint, 14(10), 1–27.

Szabolcsi, A. (1997). Quantifiers in pair-list readings. In A. Szabolcsi, editor, Ways of Scope Taking, pages 311–347. Springer.

Szabolcsi, A. (2015a). Can questions be directly disjoined? Presented at the Chicago Linguistics Society conference (CLS 51).

Szabolcsi, A. (2015b). What do quantifier particles do? Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(2), 159–204.

Theiler, N. (2014). A multitude of answers: embedded questions in typed inquisitive semantics. MSc thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Theiler, N., Roelofsen, F., and Aloni, M. (2016a). Truthful resolutions: a new perspective on false-answer sensitivity. In M. Moroney, C.-R. Little, J. Collard, and D. Burgdorf, editors, Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26. LSA and CLC Publications.

Theiler, N., Roelofsen, F., and Aloni, M. (2016b). A uniform semantics for declarative and interrogative complements. To appear in Journal of Semantics. (p.209)

Theiler, N., Roelofsen, F., and Aloni, M. (2017). What’s wrong with believing whether? In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 27.

Tichý, P. (1976). A counterexample to the Stalnaker-Lewis analysis of counterfactuals. Philosophical Studies, 29(4), 271–273.

Tichý, P. (1978). Questions, answers, and logic. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15, 275–284.

Tonhauser, J., Beaver, D., Roberts, C., and Simons, M. (2013). Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language, 89(1), 66–109.

Truckenbrodt, H. (2007). The syntax-phonology interface. The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, pages 435–456.Truckenbrodt. Place of publication and publisher, please.

Uegaki, W. (2012). Inquisitive knowledge attribution and the Gettier problem. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Weidmann-Sassoon, K. Schulz, and M. Westera, editors, Logic, Language, and Meaning. Selected papers from the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 52–61. Springer.

Väänänen, J. (2007). Dependence Logic: A New Approach to Independence Friendly Logic. Cambridge University Press.

Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and Speech Acts: Principles of Language Use. Cambridge University Press.

Velissaratou, S. (2000). Conditional questions and which-interrogatives. MSc Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Veltman, F. (1996). Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25(3), 221–261.

Wang, Y. and Fan, J. (2013). Knowing that, knowing what, and public communication: public announcement logic with kv operators. In Proceedings of the twenty-third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1147–1154. AAAI Press.

Wang, Y. and Fan, J. (2014). Conditionally knowing what. In R. Goré, B. Kooi, and A. Kurucz, editors, Advanced in Modal Logic (AIML), pages 569–587, London. College Publications.

Westera, M. (2012). Meanings as proposals: a new semantic foundation for a Gricean pragmatics. In S. Brown-Schmidt, J. Ginzburg, and S. Larsson, editors, Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial), pages 40–50. Université de Paris-Diderot.

Westera, M. (2013a). Exhaustivity through the maxim of Relation. In Proceedings of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS 10).

Westera, M. (2013b). Where the air is thin but the view so much clearer. In M. Aloni, M. Franke, and F. Roelofsen, editors, The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of, φ‎, ?φ‎, and ◊φ‎: a Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman, pages 300–316. ILLC Publications.

Westera, M. (2017). Exhaustivity and Intonation: A Unified Theory. Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam. (p.210)

Willer, M. (2013). Dynamics of epistemic modality. Philosophical Review, 122(1), 45–92.

Willer, M. (2015). Simplifying counterfactuals. In T. Brochhagen, F. Roelofsen, and N. Theiler, editors, Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 428–437.

Willer, M. (2017). Simplifying with free choice. Topoi.

Winans, L. (2012). Alternative Disjunctions in Egyptian Arabic. Master Thesis, UCLA.

Winter, Y. (2001). Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics: the Interpretation of Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language. MIT press.

Wis’niewski, A. (1995). The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences, volume 252. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Wis’niewski, A. and Leszczyn’ska-Jasion D. (2015). Inferential erotetic logic meets inquisitive semantics. Synthese, 192(6), 1585–1608.

Yablo, S. (2014). Aboutness. Princeton University Press.

Yang, F. (2014). On Extensions and Variants of Dependence Logic: A Study of Intuitionistic Connectives in the Team Semantics Setting. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki.

Yang, F. and Väänänen, J. (2016). Propositional logics of dependence. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 167(7), 557–589.

Zaefferer, D. (1991). Conditionals and unconditionals: cross-linguistic and logical aspects. Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics, pages 210–236.

Zimmermann, E. (2000). Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics, 8, 255–290.