Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Euroconstitutionalism and its Discontents$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Oliver Gerstenberg

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780198834335

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2019

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198834335.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 24 November 2020

Democratic Experimentalism and the Public Sphere

Democratic Experimentalism and the Public Sphere

Freedom of Conscience, Free Speech, and Non-Discrimination

Chapter:
(p.107) 3 Democratic Experimentalism and the Public Sphere
Source:
Euroconstitutionalism and its Discontents
Author(s):

Oliver Gerstenberg

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198834335.003.0003

This chapter argues that democratic-experimentalist forms of judicial review should not be confined to socioeconomic rights but can also be invoked with negative liberties and dignitarian personal rights. An apparent dilemma is this: on the one hand, modern, pluralist democracies are increasingly, and often irreconcilably, divided when it comes to fundamental choices which affect and express the self-understanding of a polity as a whole in matters such as, say, the right to religious freedom, free speech, the rights of transsexuals, and so forth. These matters have even become the subject of entrenched culture wars. And yet, on the other hand, there is an ever-accelerating reliance on courts and the judiciary for addressing those fundamental choices. The judiciary’s influence extends beyond settling disputes and seeps into all aspects of society, codifying the values of our times. But doesn’t this overstretch the resources of consensus-based legality? The concern is that judges are drawn into the crucible of pluralistic politics. By considering the jurisprudence of both the ECtHR and the CJEU, this chapter argues that even here courts can play a benign proceduralizing role, giving voice to the hitherto marginalized. The chapter addresses selected topical issues: the important example of freedom of conscience, which in Europe emerged after many centuries of religious persecution; the clash between free speech and personality rights; and personality rights in the context of (trans-) gender rights and same-sex marriage.

Keywords:   dignitarian constitutionalism, personal rights, culture wars, consensus-based legality, religious freedom, free speech, gender, same-sex marriage

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .