Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 9$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lara Buchak, Dean W. Zimmerman, and Philip Swenson

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780198845492

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2019

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198845492.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use.date: 30 June 2022

Why Did The One Not Remain Within Itself?

Why Did The One Not Remain Within Itself?

Chapter:
(p.106) 7 Why Did The One Not Remain Within Itself?
Source:
Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 9
Author(s):

Mark Johnston

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198845492.003.0007

God’s creative act, if genuinely free, would ground the existence of creatures without necessitating them. Since God is perfectly responsive to reason, his freely creating requires that he have an adequate but non-coercive reason to create. A coercive reason for an act is one that outweighs the reasons for any alternative act, whereas an adequate reason is one that is not outweighed by the reasons in favor of any alternative act. How, in the absence of an offsetting reason not to create, is God’s adequate reason not also a coercive reason, i.e., one that would necessitate creation? Chapter 7 argues that God’s creating and God’s remaining within himself each have to be understood as determinate manners in which God may affirm his own unsurpassable goodness. Cantorian reflections are then deployed to explain how God’s extra, i.e., un-offset, reason to create does not give him more of a reason to create than to not create. Finally, God’s actual reason to create is identified.

Keywords:   grounding, creation, unsurpassable goodness, ameliorism, Platonic Thomism, Cantor, manifestationism, infinitarian paralysis

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .