Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Agency and the Semantic Web$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher Walton

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780199292486

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2020

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199292486.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 30 November 2021

Agent communication

Agent communication

Chapter:
(p.150) 6 Agent communication
Source:
Agency and the Semantic Web
Author(s):

Christopher Walton

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780199292486.003.0012

In the preceding chapters, we have described in detail the various techniques that can be used to construct reasoning agents for the Semantic Web. However, as we have repeatedly emphasized, this reasoning capability provides only part of the functionality that will be instrumental in the construction of Semantic Web applications. To supply the remaining functionality, we must also provide a communicative capability to the agents that we construct. This capability will allow our agents to interact and cooperate with other agents on the Semantic Web, and thereby realize more complex tasks than could be accomplished with a single agent in isolation. The focus of this chapter is on how we can design and build agents which can interact together successfully on the Semantic Web. To address the issues of communication and coordination in this environment, it is useful to take our inspiration from human social systems, where these issues are solved in the real world. Following this approach, we treat a group of agents as a society, where these agents typically share a common interest, e.g. solving a specific type of problem. To become a member of this society, an agent must agree to observe certain rules and conventions. In return, the agent can itself benefit from the society, e.g. the expertise of other agents. In this societal view, it becomes possible to define conventions for the agents to follow, and the incentives for agents to operate together are made clear. This in turn makes the challenges of agent-based communication and coordination more manageable. The societal view is a popular approach in the field of MASs, and has important consequences for the way we define our systems. Our discussion is structured around the following five considerations, which must be addressed if we are to design agents that can successfully participate in a society: 1. The ability to communicate with other agents. 2. A basis on which to understand what is being communicated. 3. The ability to structure communication into coherent patterns.

Keywords:   AUML, Dialogue, Electronic Institution, ISLANDER, JADE, KIF, LCC, MIME

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .